May 23, 2019
This pack includes original textures from Quake, which was made before Doom 3 came out,. The only requirements are that you have mods such as AutoMap and the classic set of .
Feb 25, 2019
The first version of the Q2 bot config has been uploaded. It supports bots and. By creating a new map, you can easily convert all your textures into the high resolution format of .
Quake 1 Surgical Strike Bot Mod
Feb 26, 2019
The popular Quake Bot is back! The Q2 Bot mod allows players to play on servers and matches with bots that. This mod is actually a subset of the original Quake Bot, which is available for Quake .
Q:
Why would a stack of singly-linked lists be faster than a linked list in C?
I am not asking for code, just an explanation. I am very curious about how the C stack is implemented.
This document says "A list is a collection of individually addressed elements. The stack is a data structure that stores the elements on top of the list. The operations on the stack are very simple and are as follows: push(E); top(); pop().
I know that to push an element to a linked list you need to shift all elements below it down, and to pop you need to shift the top elements up, but it seems to me that this is more complex for a stack, which means less instructions per time, so the stack should be faster.
However, the document said the stack is implemented with a linked list, so what was the point of implementing a stack with a linked list if it is actually slower?
Is there any other reason for doing this?
A:
A linked list is an implementation of a stack. The linked list's underlying operations are the operations for the stack (push/pop).
The implementation of a stack can take advantage of whatever structure a linked list offers, and if the linked list can better express the operations on the stack, then it will likely be faster.
If you choose to implement a stack in a linked list, it does not follow that an implementation of a linked list is faster.
A:
There's no reason it would be faster.
The stack is a linked list, and stack-based algorithms are only faster because they are less complex. If you are trying to optimize for speed, use a better data structure. If you are be359ba680
Related links: